Driving in imaginary
snow is demanding.
When we left Amesbury, MA for the 440 mile trip to
Wellsboro, PA early Sunday morning with four or five inches of new snow on the
ground, it was snowing and in the thirties (F). Our street had been plowed in a
way that increased its treacherousness—not quite clearing the street and
compressing the wet snow undersurface into ice. Elm Street, an important
artery in the city of 16,000 , was essentially clear with some snow in the
gutters, but it was very wet. A percentage probability of rain predicted for
that morning had been long ago proved wrong and silently changed.
The route we were taking, angling down through central New
York, is notorious for snow, and a 50% probability of snow showers through
there (Oneonta, NY was our metonymic location) seemed like a slim chance for a
smooth trip. I was gripping the wheel tightly, anticipating a
Buddhist-nightmare drive where the ambiguity of the road surface would require
me to be alert for danger that more than likely did not exist except in my
head.
We went from icy and snowy on our street, to very wet and
slightly slushy on Elm Street to wet on I 495. As the miles on the
wet-but-possibly-icy-at-anytime interstate (driven at closer to the speed limit)
passed under us, the wetness of the road became less puddled until light strips
of dry pavement showed where vehicle tires had gradually peeled off the moisture
in the right lane. Eventually, the road dried completely, and the sun shone
intermittently. On a dry road, I let go of the threats posed by the road and
settled back into the threats posed by the drivers on the road, me included.
The dangers posed by sentient beings seem more manageable, primarily because
there is a chance that the negative effect will be softened by rational motivation. The probability of that
characteristic in the weather is zero.